|
Post by Gadhelyn Appledore on Sept 25, 2010 19:36:04 GMT -6
So one of our members today had suggested that we have some sort of naming system for Consortium retainers in the wards. On top of that, seeing as most people are probably going to pile their retainers in the first ward, I was thinking we could make the 8th or 9th wards the Consortium wards. Try to take over the stalls and such. Anyone for such a thing? Ideas?
|
|
|
Post by Ralrra on Sept 25, 2010 22:37:53 GMT -6
I'm fine with whatever naming scheme you come up with.
Also, how about something near the end of the list for wards?
|
|
|
Post by Garent Jard on Sept 26, 2010 14:26:24 GMT -6
I think that's a fantastic idea. 8th and 9th sounds good to me.
As for a naming convention... How far do we want to take it? A "CC" in front of your Retainer's name? Or should we get more specific, like "Ccgarentweapons"
|
|
|
Post by pinkmermaid on Sept 27, 2010 21:31:56 GMT -6
I won't be changing my ratiners name as I like him alot and can't change names. I posted his name in my bio post thing though. I also honestly wouldn't want to move him out of the first ward into a different one until I see that that is successful. I know most of the thousands of people in game won't know about checking for this ls's ward yet (most dont go on forums).
|
|
|
Post by Shaiyu Fhaleri on Sept 29, 2010 13:54:57 GMT -6
As regards to the ward part of this post it seems SE will be making some sort of orginization system for them soon
|
|
|
Post by natzapo on Sept 29, 2010 22:45:08 GMT -6
hmm, I also found this link, could help with collecting data on what items are being priced at if people use it. could be handy till SE adds some sort of search function www.ffxivpro.com/bazaar
|
|
|
Post by majidah on Oct 5, 2010 11:26:53 GMT -6
SE has posted that they are planning to divide the wards into sections in a week or two and add multiple retainers; I really like my current one so I don't want to change its name (crystalshop), but I wouldnt have a problem naming my retainers after CC afterwards.
ConsortiumWeavingA, ConsortiumWeavingB, ConsortiumWeavingC, ConsortiumWeavingAA AB and so one seems a good system if you ask me.
|
|